I have a really comfortable mutual follow going on with some of you where we don’t talk a whole lot but it’s just really nice and I like seeing you on my dash and if you ever unfollow me I would be unjustifiably sad

(Source: seblaine)

(Source: abrieftasteoflove)

moriaufey:

sassygaysherlock:

violonpleurant:

thesheepwearinglace:

one of these days my fandoms are going to kill me.

asdfghyju……….

(Source: ilovefitzgerald)

Female toplessness is legal in a lot of places in the US (although not where I live), and I’d be meeting the letter of the law with a couple of Band-aids. But I have a gut feeling that if I go anywhere that there are people—and particularly anywhere there are children—nobody’s going to be too happy about my Band-aids. The enforcement is social; women just don’t go around topless in the US.

It bothers me because it’s unequal, but it also bothers me in its implications: that my body is inherently sexual, and a man’s body isn’t. It feels like men are being viewed through the first-person lens of “it’s nice to feel the sun on my skin, and I don’t mean anything by it” and women are being viewed through the distinctly third-person lens of “it’s inappropriate for me, a heterosexual man, to see her sexy parts.” It ignores the experiences of people who are turned on by male chests and somehow manage to contain themselves when they see one.

The Pervocracy: My boobs want to be free. (via sexisnottheenemy)

I have no desire to go topless anywhere, but I thought this made good points about perspective, and about how female [identified?] bodies are considered inherently sexual even when nothing sexual is going on or implied.

(via feministdisney)

Matthew Gray Gubler’s reasons to stay alive…

(Source: gublerheaven)